The impact of advertising on children, either directly or
indirectly continues to arouse a considerable amount of controversy all over
the world. One of the most emotionally charged allegation against advertising
is that it is harmful to children who are regarded as immature and totally
gullible.
On the other hand, advertisers argue that the primary goal
of advertising is to inform child audiences that will widen their range of
choice in particular market rather than ending up with purchasing unwanted
products. Moreover, today’s children have grown up with television and internet
and they have learned to cope with these equipment. The anxiety is on the part
of parents/grandparents/teachers/religious leaders for whom television or
Internet are relatively new media.
The arguments against advertising to children usually claim
that advertisement creates artificial demands from children which parents are
reluctant to gratify. This will create additional family tensions. The specific
arguments against ad are the following:
·
Television
commercial suggests to children that without the product, they are inferior
·
Children
between 4 -7 years cannot tell fact from fantasy from an advertisement
·
Advertisement
make children nag their parents and this creates artificial demands
·
Advertisements
encourages children to buy things which are too costly for the parents
·
Children
in advertisements sometimes set a bad example
·
Junk
foods, such as pizzas, burgers and soft drinks, are heavily promoted during
children’s TV viewing time. This develops a craving for fatty, sugary and fast
foods in kids, thereby affecting their health adversely.
·
Many
advertisements include dangerous stunts, which can be performed only by
experts
·
Even
though the commercials broadcast the statutory warnings with the ad, the kids
often try to imitate the stunts at home, with fatal results
0 comments:
Post a Comment